Kelowna B.C.

Kelowna B.C.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Why Canadians Should Worry!

This is what makes me mad about the direction the Canadian Government is going and how our reputation in the world is being spoiled.
I came accross this post this morning and it hits the nail on the head, Canadian oil companies and minning companies are distroying the environmnet, the communities, and people who try to stand up against them, throughout the world and it's making Canada look like the principle problem in our attempt to conbat global warming. Anyways here's the post;

Canadian Mining Companies Continue to Make Headlines


In 2009, Liberal MP John McKay introduced a private members bill, Bill C-300, in an attempt to hold Canadian mining companies, operating abroad, to account for human rights abuses.

Almost immediately he began receiving threats, and several other MPs spoke of similar threats to their careers by the mining lobby. The bill was defeated 135 to 140, with 13 Liberal, 5 Bloc and 4 NDP absent from the vote.

Brent Popplewell wrote a piece for the Toronto Star on the abuses, saying that:

The word "Canada" is so reviled in some places that travelling Canadians mask their citizenship by wearing American flags on their caps and backpacks.
Recently a Mining Justice Conference was held in Vancouver.

Indigenous representatives from Latin America were in Vancouver the week of May 16 speaking out on Canadian mining companies and the negative impacts operations are having on local communities.

Human rights violations, environmental degradation, bribery, intimidation and disregard for local villages and indigenous populations are alleged to have occurred at the hands of publicly shared operations with home bases in Vancouver.
From protests in Guatemala over the abuse in Canada of temporary foreign workers to Tibetans fighting against the exploitation of their mineral rights, we can't really say that Canada has lost its international notoriety.

Around the world we are becoming reviled. I think I'd rather they didn't know who we were.
Posted by Emily Dee (Pushed to the Left and loving it)

Monday, May 23, 2011

The New Cabinet.


Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his cabinet pose for a group photo following a swearing in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Wednesday May 18, 2011. Left to Right, top row: Steven Blaney, Minister of Veterans Affairs, Edward Fast , Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway, Joe Oliver, Minister of Natural Resources, Peter Penashue, Intergovernmental Affairs and President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, Julian Fantino, Associate Minister of National Defence, Bernard Valcourt, Minister of State (Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency), Gordon OƕConnor, Minister of State and Chief Government Whip, Maxime Bernier, Minister of State (Small Business and Tourism), Lynne Yelich , Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification), Gary Goodyear, Minister of State (Science and Technology) (Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), Ted Menzies, Minister of State (Finance), Tim Uppal, Minister of State (Democratic Reform), Bal Gosal, Minister of State (Sport). Middle Row( left to right): John Duncan, Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, Tony Clement, President of the Treasury Board and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario, Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, Peter Van Loan, Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism, Gerry Ritz, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board, Christian Paradis, Minister of Industry and Minister of State (Agriculture), James Moore, Minister Canadian Heritage and Official Languages, Denis Lebel , Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec, Leona Aglukkaq, Minister of Health and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, Keith Ashfield, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans and Minister for the Atlantic Gateway, Peter Kent, Minister of Environment, Lisa Raitt, Minister of Labour, Alice Wong , Minister of State (Seniors), Gail Shea , Minister of National Revenue. Front Row(left to right): Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Marjory LeBreton, Leader of the Government in the Senate, Peter MacKay, Minister of Defence, Vic Toews, Minister of Public Safety, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Governor General David Johnston, Rona Ambrose , Minister Public Works and Government Services and Minister for the Status of Women, Diane Finley , Human Resources and Skills Development, Bev Oda, Minister of International Co-operation, John Baird , Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Steven Fletcher, Minister of State (Transport),THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Cabinet cost soars as Tories look to trim fat

This is a good article I came across this morning;

OTTAWA - Tightening a belt is tricky when you have to wrap it around 39 people.

Stephen Harper's biggest cabinet ever will have to do some sucking in of its collective gut if the Conservatives are serious about trimming the fat.

The annual salary bill for all the ministers and junior ministers appointed last week is about $9 million — the largest on record.

That's at a time when the Conservatives are looking to slash $4 billion from the bureaucracy and billions more in the coming years to balance the books.

The prime minister's team rivals the largest cabinets of Brian Mulroney and Paul Martin.

According to 2011 figures on Parliament's website, an ordinary MP draws a base salary of $157,731 per year. As prime minister, Harper gets double that plus a car allowance.

Still, Harper's $317,574 salary to run the country is modest compared with what bank presidents and top executives in the private sector make.

Ministers get $75,516 atop their MP base salary, plus a car allowance. Ministers of state get an extra $56,637, but no car allowance.

Marjory LeBreton gets $132,300 for being a senator and another $75,500 for her role as leader of the government in the Senate.

So with one prime minister, 25 ministers, 11 ministers of state, and government senate and house leaders, it all works out to roughly $9 million in salaries and perks.

And don't forget all those staffers.

The Conservatives quietly approved increases in the maximum salaries political staff are entitled to receive.

The changes went into effect April 1, even though Harper has announced budget cuts to eliminate the federal deficit one year ahead of schedule, in 2014-15.

The prime minister said that feat would be achieved "by controlling spending and cutting waste."

Whether a staffer actually receives the maximum allowable salary is left up to the discretion of each minister, who must still keep within an overall office budget.

But ministers will have a little more money to play with since the government has decreed that their offices should no longer have to foot the bill for international travel by ministers, their staff and parliamentary secretaries. Those costs will now be absorbed by government departments instead.

The Prime Minister's Office says cabinet salaries are largely covered by MPs' regular wages.

"Almost two thirds of your cost is actually their salaries as MPs, which would have to be paid whether or not they're in cabinet," spokesman Andrew MacDougall said in an email.

Harper has also defended his beefed-up bench.

"I think it's important to know when you're talking about austerity, that this government has reduced ministerial budgets significantly," he said after his cabinet was sworn in at Rideau Hall.

"So the question here is not cost. The question is making sure that we have a ministry that is broad, representative of the country and tries to use people's talents to the maximum. ...

"I think it would be a mistake to try and have a smaller cabinet that would make less use of people."

Harper's cabinet ranks in size with Mulroney and Martin's 39-member teams.

When Mulroney appointed his first Progressive Conservative cabinet in 1984, a minister earned $95,200. There was also a tax-free expense allowance of $17,600, which varied depending on the MP's riding.

Mulroney made $115,100, plus the tax-free expense allowance, when he took office.

At the time of Martin's first Liberal cabinet in late 2003, a minister's salary with car allowance had risen to $208,138. The more junior secretary of state job earned $189,312.

Martin made $280,522 at the time.

Derek Fildebrandt of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation says his issue isn't so much with what cabinet ministers make, but with the pensions they go on to collect at age 55.

"We're fine that they're decently compensated," Fildebrandt said.

"They're not outrageously compensated. They're well compensated, but they're not outrageously compensated. But pension-wise, they are outrageously compensated."

The group says that for every $1 an MP puts into their pension plan, taxpayers contribute another $4.

Fildebrandt also questioned defeated MPs' severance packages.

Defeated Conservative cabinet minister Josee Verner wasn't in the House of Commons long enough to get a pension. But like all MPs who have served fewer than six years, she qualifies for a severance equal to half her salary.

Verner's nearly $117,000 golden parachute may ease her jump to the Red Chamber — where she will earn $132,300 a year as one of Harper's three new senators.

Compare that to what a typical Canadian family makes. The median after-tax income of a family of two is $63,900, according to Statistics Canada.

By Steve Rennie, The Canadian Press, thecanadianpress.com, Updated: May 22, 2011

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Dissecting the Liberals decline

After that dismal loss I think for my own purposes I need to rationalize what happened to the political party that I liked and supported and thought actually had a chance. First of all the Liberals have been bleeding supporters since the days of Trudeau mania and before. The first segment of the Canadian voter to leave was the western vote, and of course the "National Energy Program" introduced in 1980 didn't help. We then have the departure of the Unions to the NDP and big business to the Conservatives, this was all around about the same time period. In the 1980's it was the the French Canadian vote where in 1980 the Liberals held 74 seats in Quebec and in 1984 they only held 17seats there. all along their was a steady decline in the religious vote to the right wing Conservative, probably alot of that was through the acquisition of votes from the Social Credit party and the Co-operative Commonwealth Party. Now in this election the Liberals have seem to have lost the new Canadians or ethnic vote, largely impart to the steady hard work of the Conservatives to secure these votes. What I find interesting is that the Liberals haven't had much if any success in Alberta since the days of Wilfrid Laurier back in 1908. Another thing to note is that up until the 1980's Quebec had always had a Liberal majority, all the way through Canada's history. Anyways I think that it is extremely important to know exactly where you came from in order to get yourself out of what your in, and for the Liberals that is a fall from the greatest national party that seem to be the natural governing party throughout Canada's rich history.
1911 election results
1926 election results
1968 Trudeau mania election results
1980 election results
1984 election results
2004 election results
2011 election results






Election Disappointments

Well its been almost a week since the Tuesday night election results of 2011, and wow what a huge disappointment. The Liberal party has finished the worst they ever have in their parties history. The NDP surge that started in Quebec continued into many other parts of Canada as well. The Conservatives and Stephen Harper have just gotten their covented majority they have working so hard to achieve. I was surprised by those results because we still have sixty percent of Canadians who still don't like Stephen Harper, but yet he won and with a majority. The reason was largely due to the vote splitting between NDP and Liberals in many riding's especially in Ontario, where the Conservatives completely cleaned up. Vote splitting coupled with the large efforts Harper made to gain seats in that province, Harper didn't need any seats in the vote rich province of Quebec to obtain his majority.
Anyways the Liberals were reduced to 48 seats when John Diefenbaker won his majority with 208 seats in the 1958 election. The Liberals were also taken down to 40 seats in 1980 when Brian Mulrony won his majority with 211 seats. What I see it is that Harpers majority is much weaker then the other Conservative majorities. What is also a good thing to mention is that when the Liberals got back into power in 1993 the Conservatives were obliterated to a measly 2 seats, however the Reform party did have 52 seats.
I guess whats important to me is that Canada continues to be the world leader in peace, prosperity, and equality. I hope we here in Canada don't continue to see a widening gap between the rich and the poor, and that we don't see a rise in control that corporations have in governing and law making. I hope that health care will be there for everybody when and where they need it. I hope our military continues to act in a peace keeping roll. I hope Canada begins to take measures to combat climate change, and i hope we can reduce the impact the tar sands are having on our planet. I hope we protect our oceans and we prevent any off shore catastrophe's like the one that happened in the Gulf of Mexico with B.P. I would also like to see the Artic preserved as a world park and that no oil exploration by any country take place, however I don't see that one by Harper and his cronies.
In short I will always love my country whoever is in power, I just think the Liberal party had more in common with what is important to me than any other party including the NDP and especially the Conservatives. In the next few blogs I will try to dissect what actually happened to the Liberal Party of Canada.